16.5 C
Johannesburg
- Advertisement -

Taiwan rejects South African demand to move its representative office from capital

Must read

By Christopher Bodeen

Taiwan has rejected South Africa’s demand that it move its representative office in the country from the capital, Pretoria, to the commercial center of Johannesburg, in the latest attempt by the self-governing island republic to push back against Chinese moves to diplomatically isolate it.

Taiwan Foreign Ministry spokesperson Jeff Liu said at a news conference on Tuesday that the demand to move or shut the office violated a 1997 agreement between the sides on the location of their mutual representative offices following the severing of formal diplomatic relations.

“Facing this kind of unreasonable demand, our side cannot grant our acceptance,” Liu said.

South Africa maintains a liaison office in Taiwan’s capital, Taipei, and the sides have a strong commercial relationship. The offices function as de-facto embassies and consulates since the two sides lack formal diplomatic ties. They were broken when South Africa cut diplomatic ties with Taiwan to establish relations with China.

Taiwan maintains such missions in all major nations but has just five in Africa, where China has been increasing its presence by building roads, railways and other infrastructure. In 2017, Nigeria ordered Taiwan’s liaison office to move from the administrative capital of Abuja to the commercial center of Lagos and Taiwan complied.

Liu repeated Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung’s avowal at the legislature on Monday that Taiwan “was prepared for all eventualities” over the demand. The office is Taiwanese property and Taipei retains the right to determine its location and status, Lin and Liu said.

China, which claims Taiwan as its own territory that must be annexed by force if necessary, relentlessly seeks to minimize Taiwan’s international representation, although the self-governing island republic maintains robust unofficial relations with the U.S. and other major nations.

South Africa confirmed last week that it had asked Taiwan to move its liaison office, in a demand seen purely as a concession to China, which has used its influence to keep Taiwan out of the United Nations and affiliated branches such as the World Health Organization, and limit its formal diplomatic partners to just 11 countries and the Vatican.

In addition to diplomatic and economic pressure, China has stepped up its military threats against Taiwan, most recently holding large-scale live-fire drills just off the Chinese coastal province of Fujian, which faces Taiwan.

South Africa’s demand that Taiwan move its office has also drawn attention in the U.S. Congress, with Tennessee Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn posting on the social platform X that “the United States should not tolerate this behavior from South Africa.”

“I am calling on … the Biden administration to make it clear that there will be consequences if South Africa works with the (Chinese Communist Party) to bully Taiwan,” including removing South Africa from a key trade program, Blackburn said.

“The United States must not provide trade benefits to countries that prioritize China’s influence over democratic partnerships,” she added.

Taiwan and South Africa had close relations during the decades of apartheid rule and when Taiwan was under martial law. That changed in the late 1980s and early 1990s when both countries turned to democracy. But China’s rise as a global power and support for the African National Congress prompted former President Nelson Mandela to break off ties with Taiwan as Beijing demanded.

It’s not clear what practical impact the relocation of Taiwan’s office would have, but Taiwan has shown an increasing determination to resist China’s campaign of diplomatic slights and military intimidation. It remains unclear whether South Africa would follow through on its threat to shut down the office’s operations if Taipei sticks with its insistence on not moving.

AP

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Oxford University Press

Latest article