By Marcus Moloko
Advocate Annelene van den Heever has once again become the focal point of South Africa’s legal and public discourse, following a dramatic courtroom clash involving her client, Vusimusi “Cat” Matlala.
This week, tensions erupted in the high court in Johannesburg when Matlala, frustrated by police restrictions, shouted for his lawyer and grabbed her arm in full view of the media.
The incident highlighted both the volatility of her clients and the uncompromising defence style that has defined Van den Heever’s career.
The chaos unfolded after Judge Cassim Moosa adjourned proceedings early. Police tactical officers attempted to block Matlala and his co-accused from consulting their lawyers before being escorted to holding cells.
Triggered by the actions, Matlala loudly called out to his advocate: “Annelene, come here!” As she approached to discuss matters, there was a point where Matlala was seen grabbing her arm, an act captured on video and has been widely circulated on social media
On social media, commentators discussed that the grab appeared aggressive and uncomfortable, yet Van den Heever did not retreat.
Instead, she lambasted police conduct and secured a ruling from Judge Moosa affirming the accused’s right to consult their legal representatives after adjournments.
Matlala’s ongoing trials have thrust Van den Heever back into the spotlight.
He faces a 25-count indictment for attempted murder, conspiracy, fraud and defeating the ends of justice, stemming from an alleged 2023 hit on actress Tebogo Thobejane. Separately, he is charged with tender fraud and corruption linked to a R228 million SA Police Service occupational health and wellness contract awarded to his company, Medicare24.
At the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry into police corruption and state capture, Van den Heever has fiercely invoked Matlala’s constitutional rights, preventing him from answering questions that could prejudice his criminal trials.
ALSO READ: Mapisa-Nqakula trial postponed for a week over ill health
Van den Heever’s reputation as a “hard nut to crack” is rooted in her consistent defence of South Africa’s most notorious accused. Her portfolio reads like a roll call of the country’s most controversial cases:
· Vusi “Khekhe” Mathibela: Murder of billionaire Wandile Bozwana. He was convicted and sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment;
· Radovan Krejčíř Czech fugitive tied to organised crime, drug trafficking and murder. He was convicted and serves multiple lengthy sentences;
· Shepherd and Mary Bushiri on fraud, money laundering and theft. The pair have extradition battles underway;
· Rapper AKA murder suspects arrested in 2023. Van den Heever challenged the constitutionality of the arrests; and
· Vusimusi “Cat” Matlala.
Her courtroom style is combative, often clashing with judges and prosecutors. In the AKA murder case, she argued her clients’ constitutional rights were violated. In Krejčíř’s trials, she fought against the state’s organised crime evidence. With the Bushiris, she defended their bail rights before their dramatic flight to Malawi.
Supporters argue Van den Heever embodies the constitutional principle that even the most vilified deserve a robust defence. Critics, however, contend she thrives on controversy and deliberately courts public attention.
Yet her record shows a consistent theme. She refuses to back down, whether against prosecutors, commissions or even judges.
With Matlala’s trials continuing, Van den Heever’s role will remain under scrutiny. The courtroom arm-grab incident highlighted both the volatility of her clients and the intensity of her defence work.
As she prepares to battle the state on multiple fronts, one thing is clear: Van den Heever has become synonymous with defending South Africa’s most notorious accused, and her uncompromising approach ensures she will remain a lightning rod in the country’s legal landscape.
