By Marcus Moloko
Prominent forensic investigator Paul O’Sullivan faced a barrage of questioning from Parliamentarians before the Ad Hoc Committee on why he did not want to disclose certain details concerning his background, family, and other details before 1990.
O’Sullivan made it clear that he would not engage in family or business discussions prior to 1990 as a safety measure.
It was the EFF’s Julius Malema among Parliament members who questioned why paragraph three in O’Sullivan’s testimony was allowed and had to be removed.
ALSO READ: Evidence leaders to seek postponement of Nkabinde Inquiry on Monday
“We cannot have a witness who states to us which questions to ask and which not to ask,” Malema probed.
“This paragraph must be removed,” Malema said, demanding the removal of the paragraph O’ Sullivan made.
“How do we treat paragraph three?” quested the EFF leader.
O’Sullivan appeared in person on Tuesday, after
You’ve reached your free article limit
Subscribe to enjoy unlimited access to trusted journalism. Cancel anytime.
Subscribe nowNeed help? molokom@insidepolitic.co.za
